<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Blog Posts</title>
    <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>pmbruno@optonline.net</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-08-12T15:59:29-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Delayed Gratification and Higher SAT Scores?</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/delayed_gratification_and_higher_sat_scores/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/delayed_gratification_and_higher_sat_scores/#When:15:59:29Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/marshiStockXSmall_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="320" height="178" />These past few weeks have been quite challenging for me as it’s summer vacation and the kids are not in their regular schedule.&nbsp; Now don’t get me wrong, I love having my kids home for the summer and they definitely need it but it’s hard to keep them busy all the time.&nbsp; Therefore I do things I probably shouldn’t do to keep them busy and happy …maybe too happy, in fact. You see, during the school year we have RULES – make your bed, use your manners, clear your plate from the table and absolutely NO TV before homework and piano and there is to be NO ice cream or candy during the week. I guess you could say that I’m one of those “delay gratification moms.”</p>

<p>I know what drives me to be like this – my past.&nbsp; I remember my father always said, “Pumpkin – do you really think you need that?&nbsp; Why don’t you wait for a few days?&nbsp; You know, patience is a virtue.” And boy, did that ever cause me to get angry and have a temper tantrum – even when I was teenager. However, now I can truly appreciate why he always wanted me to wait and practice patience.&nbsp; </p>

<p>I am just like everyone else – I like nice things a lot, new shoes and handbags – but this important life skill of self discipline and delayed gratification that my dad helped me with has kept me from making poor choices and piling on significant amounts of debt. Waiting to purchase those things that I truly coveted and thought I “needed” has been one of the best financial lessons I was taught at a very young age.&nbsp; </p>

<p>So much comes to our children so easily – they rarely need to wait anymore. A lot of this has been driven by technology (instant messaging, email, music downloads, etc) and the commercialization of our society. All fosters an attitude of “you can get what you want, when you want it.”&nbsp; Children, including mine, grow up thinking that instant gratification and acquisition of a want – usually a toy or some type of sweet— is the way to happiness!!&nbsp; 
</p><p>
<a href="http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/comments/delayed_gratification_and_higher_sat_scores/#extended">Read On »</a>
</p>
 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/marshiStockXSmall_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="320" height="178" />These past few weeks have been quite challenging for me as it’s summer vacation and the kids are not in their regular schedule.&nbsp; Now don’t get me wrong, I love having my kids home for the summer and they definitely need it but it’s hard to keep them busy all the time.&nbsp; Therefore I do things I probably shouldn’t do to keep them busy and happy …maybe too happy, in fact. You see, during the school year we have RULES – make your bed, use your manners, clear your plate from the table and absolutely NO TV before homework and piano and there is to be NO ice cream or candy during the week. I guess you could say that I’m one of those “delay gratification moms.”</p>

<p>I know what drives me to be like this – my past.&nbsp; I remember my father always said, “Pumpkin – do you really think you need that?&nbsp; Why don’t you wait for a few days?&nbsp; You know, patience is a virtue.” And boy, did that ever cause me to get angry and have a temper tantrum – even when I was teenager. However, now I can truly appreciate why he always wanted me to wait and practice patience.&nbsp; </p>

<p>I am just like everyone else – I like nice things a lot, new shoes and handbags – but this important life skill of self discipline and delayed gratification that my dad helped me with has kept me from making poor choices and piling on significant amounts of debt. Waiting to purchase those things that I truly coveted and thought I “needed” has been one of the best financial lessons I was taught at a very young age.&nbsp; </p>

<p>So much comes to our children so easily – they rarely need to wait anymore. A lot of this has been driven by technology (instant messaging, email, music downloads, etc) and the commercialization of our society. All fosters an attitude of “you can get what you want, when you want it.”&nbsp; Children, including mine, grow up thinking that instant gratification and acquisition of a want – usually a toy or some type of sweet— is the way to happiness!!&nbsp; 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-08-12T15:59:29-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Discover Diane Birch &amp;amp; Donate To a Charity &amp;amp; Chance to Win!!</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/discover_diane_birch_donate_to_a_charity_chance_to_win/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/discover_diane_birch_donate_to_a_charity_chance_to_win/#When:15:57:44Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/1242150349_resized_birchCD.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="250" /><br />
Discover the critically acclaimed debut album, <b>Bible Belt</b> from new artist <b>Diane Birch</b>. Her music is <i><b>sinfully soulful </b></i>and her single of the week, <b>“Rise Up”</b> is already one of the 10 top albums on iTunes – and it was just released yesterday.&nbsp; But the best part of the story, in my opinion, is that if you purchase her album through the link provided below, $1 will be donated to charity - automatically.</p>

<p>S-Curve Records and Diane Birch are proud to present <b>Discover &amp; Donate</b>. You discover Diane Birch’s soulful debut album, <b>“Bible Belt”</b> ,then you choose one of six charities to receive a $1 donation from your purchase. The charities are:&nbsp; SOS Children’s Villages, Autism Speaks, March of Dimes, Keep A Child Alive, Share Our Strength or Susan G. Komen for the Cure.</p>

<p>Additionally, you can download the <b>Discover &amp; Donate widget </b>to your site – wherever that might be and who ever raises the most money for charity through their widget by June 23, 2009, will win a FREE PRIVATE PERFORMANCE in the winner’s hometown!! How cool is that? <a href="http://tr.im/ndpV" title="Click here to start sharing">Click here to start sharing</a>.</p>

<p><i><b>Please do one of 2 things to support Diane Birch, her music and cause:</b></i></p>

<p>Download the <a href="http://tr.im/ndpV" title="Discover &amp; Donate ">Discover &amp; Donate </a>widget to your site here – and when someone clicks through that widget to buy the album, $1 to charity will be made in YOUR name and who ever raises the most $ - wins a Free Private Performance with Diane Birch.</p>

<p>Or just click below at the banner and BUY the CD to support one of the charities.</p>

<p><img style="visibility:hidden;width:0px;height:0px;" border=0 width=0 height=0 src="http://counters.gigya.com/wildfire/IMP/CXNID=2000002.0NXC/bT*xJmx*PTEyNDQwNDY*ODYyOTYmcHQ9MTI*NDA*NjQ4OTY4NyZwPTUyMjg3MSZkPSZnPTImdD*mbz1mODI5MWUwMDhiNzI*MDUxOGQzZmRmYmMwOWJmMTIxNSZvZj*w.gif" /></p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" width="160" height="160" id="Diane Birch" align="middle"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.dianebirch.com/charity/diane_160_village.swf" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" />	<embed src="http://www.dianebirch.com/charity/diane_160_village.swf" menu="false" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="160" height="160" name="Diane Birch" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" /></object> 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/1242150349_resized_birchCD.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="250" /><br />
Discover the critically acclaimed debut album, <b>Bible Belt</b> from new artist <b>Diane Birch</b>. Her music is <i><b>sinfully soulful </b></i>and her single of the week, <b>“Rise Up”</b> is already one of the 10 top albums on iTunes – and it was just released yesterday.&nbsp; But the best part of the story, in my opinion, is that if you purchase her album through the link provided below, $1 will be donated to charity - automatically.</p>

<p>S-Curve Records and Diane Birch are proud to present <b>Discover &amp; Donate</b>. You discover Diane Birch’s soulful debut album, <b>“Bible Belt”</b> ,then you choose one of six charities to receive a $1 donation from your purchase. The charities are:&nbsp; SOS Children’s Villages, Autism Speaks, March of Dimes, Keep A Child Alive, Share Our Strength or Susan G. Komen for the Cure.</p>

<p>Additionally, you can download the <b>Discover &amp; Donate widget </b>to your site – wherever that might be and who ever raises the most money for charity through their widget by June 23, 2009, will win a FREE PRIVATE PERFORMANCE in the winner’s hometown!! How cool is that? <a href="http://tr.im/ndpV" title="Click here to start sharing">Click here to start sharing</a>.</p>

<p><i><b>Please do one of 2 things to support Diane Birch, her music and cause:</b></i></p>

<p>Download the <a href="http://tr.im/ndpV" title="Discover &amp; Donate ">Discover &amp; Donate </a>widget to your site here – and when someone clicks through that widget to buy the album, $1 to charity will be made in YOUR name and who ever raises the most $ - wins a Free Private Performance with Diane Birch.</p>

<p>Or just click below at the banner and BUY the CD to support one of the charities.</p>

<p><img style="visibility:hidden;width:0px;height:0px;" border=0 width=0 height=0 src="http://counters.gigya.com/wildfire/IMP/CXNID=2000002.0NXC/bT*xJmx*PTEyNDQwNDY*ODYyOTYmcHQ9MTI*NDA*NjQ4OTY4NyZwPTUyMjg3MSZkPSZnPTImdD*mbz1mODI5MWUwMDhiNzI*MDUxOGQzZmRmYmMwOWJmMTIxNSZvZj*w.gif" /></p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" width="160" height="160" id="Diane Birch" align="middle"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.dianebirch.com/charity/diane_160_village.swf" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" />	<embed src="http://www.dianebirch.com/charity/diane_160_village.swf" menu="false" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="160" height="160" name="Diane Birch" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" /></object>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-06-03T15:57:44-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Are You Responsible For Your Financial Life?</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/are/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/are/#When:00:53:22Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/princecharnmXSmall_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="165" /> When my friend Jacki and I meet – which is quite often, we always invariably leave with this burning question:&nbsp; <b>why are women less likely to take responsibility for their financial wellbeing?</b> The question came up again because I ran across a statistic that states: </p>

<p>Only 15% of married women feel responsible for their financial lives, planning, or retirement. </p>

<p>Source: The National Center for Women and Retirement Research</p>

<p>One of my friends thinks that maybe it has to do with women&#8217;s relationship with perfectionism, how we hate to appear inadequate or ignorant on any front. When she was going through the process of buying her first apartment, she despised how frequently she didn&#8217;t know terminology or ended up feeling intimidated by all the ins and outs (especially in the New York market). &#8220;Most of the time,&#8220; she explained, &#8220;I feel pretty competent, so not knowing what the heck I was doing was a feeling I really hated.&#8220; I wonder if some women avoid taking those first difficult steps to understand finances because it simply makes them feel dumb. </p>

<p>
<a href="http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/comments/are/#extended">Read On »</a>
</p>
 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/princecharnmXSmall_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="165" /> When my friend Jacki and I meet – which is quite often, we always invariably leave with this burning question:&nbsp; <b>why are women less likely to take responsibility for their financial wellbeing?</b> The question came up again because I ran across a statistic that states: </p>

<p>Only 15% of married women feel responsible for their financial lives, planning, or retirement. </p>

<p>Source: The National Center for Women and Retirement Research</p>

<p>One of my friends thinks that maybe it has to do with women&#8217;s relationship with perfectionism, how we hate to appear inadequate or ignorant on any front. When she was going through the process of buying her first apartment, she despised how frequently she didn&#8217;t know terminology or ended up feeling intimidated by all the ins and outs (especially in the New York market). &#8220;Most of the time,&#8220; she explained, &#8220;I feel pretty competent, so not knowing what the heck I was doing was a feeling I really hated.&#8220; I wonder if some women avoid taking those first difficult steps to understand finances because it simply makes them feel dumb. </p>

]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-06-03T00:53:22-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Women &#45; Are We Giving Up Too Much?</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/women_-_are_we_giving_up_too_much/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/women_-_are_we_giving_up_too_much/#When:20:27:28Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/hidingXSmall_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="280" height="185" />A friend of mine, Leslie Bennetts, author of the “<a href="http://www.thefemininemistake.com/" title="The Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Much">The Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Much</a>” wrote a piece in Elle magazine titled, “<a href="http://www.elle.com/Living/Society-Culture/The-Upstarter-Wife" title="The Upstarter Wife">The Upstarter Wife</a>” a story about Gigi Levangie Grazer and how she triumphantly approached her divorce, that I feel compelled to write about.&nbsp; Levangie, a very successful women and author approached divorce much differently, I believe than women who quit their careers when they get married or have children.&nbsp; After reading the article, again I am questioning why women sacrifice their financial security for motherhood and wonder whether we are giving up too much?&nbsp; Is the media in part to blame? Does the media only give us one side of the story?&nbsp; Is the dream of the white picket fence so strong that we ignore the reality of the “what if”?</p>

<p>Leslie argues that most women who have quit the labor force to be full time mothers are being lulled into a false sense of complacency about relinquishing their financial autonomy – which I wholeheartedly agree with.&nbsp; The media gives lots of coverage to women who quit the labor force to become full-time mothers, and treat this decision as if it were simply a lifestyle choice. The media never seems to mention the “risks of economic dependency – or the myriad benefits of work.” As a result, Leslie argues that women have been lulled into a dangerous sense of complacency about relinquishing their financial autonomy?&nbsp; Why hasn’t the media or anyone else told the truth about how much these women might be sacrificing&#8212;or what the consequences could be?&nbsp; 
</p><p>
<a href="http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/comments/women_-_are_we_giving_up_too_much/#extended">Read On »</a>
</p>
 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/hidingXSmall_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="280" height="185" />A friend of mine, Leslie Bennetts, author of the “<a href="http://www.thefemininemistake.com/" title="The Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Much">The Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Much</a>” wrote a piece in Elle magazine titled, “<a href="http://www.elle.com/Living/Society-Culture/The-Upstarter-Wife" title="The Upstarter Wife">The Upstarter Wife</a>” a story about Gigi Levangie Grazer and how she triumphantly approached her divorce, that I feel compelled to write about.&nbsp; Levangie, a very successful women and author approached divorce much differently, I believe than women who quit their careers when they get married or have children.&nbsp; After reading the article, again I am questioning why women sacrifice their financial security for motherhood and wonder whether we are giving up too much?&nbsp; Is the media in part to blame? Does the media only give us one side of the story?&nbsp; Is the dream of the white picket fence so strong that we ignore the reality of the “what if”?</p>

<p>Leslie argues that most women who have quit the labor force to be full time mothers are being lulled into a false sense of complacency about relinquishing their financial autonomy – which I wholeheartedly agree with.&nbsp; The media gives lots of coverage to women who quit the labor force to become full-time mothers, and treat this decision as if it were simply a lifestyle choice. The media never seems to mention the “risks of economic dependency – or the myriad benefits of work.” As a result, Leslie argues that women have been lulled into a dangerous sense of complacency about relinquishing their financial autonomy?&nbsp; Why hasn’t the media or anyone else told the truth about how much these women might be sacrificing&#8212;or what the consequences could be?&nbsp; 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-05-18T20:27:28-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Should We Be Concerned About What is Going On With Chrysler?</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/should_we_be_concerned_about_what_is_going_on_with_chrysler/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/should_we_be_concerned_about_what_is_going_on_with_chrysler/#When:17:37:46Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/gloveiStock_000008069848XSmall_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="300" />The other night as I was watching the news, yes Fox news, I heard an attorney from Case &amp; White talking about how his clients (the Chrysler bondholders) were being asked to take a deal for .33 cents on the dollar and they were being chastised (bullied was the word that was used) by the Administration for holding out.&nbsp; Now bondholders are secured creditors and should get paid more in a bankruptcy than unsecured creditors (including the union).&nbsp; Now the assets of Chrysler are being sold to a new company controlled by Fiat and the union!!&nbsp; I just can&#8217;t believe some of this stuff we are hearing and that is going on in America and give alot of respect to those that can speak out, specifically <a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/cliff-asness-i-am-ready-for-my.html" title="Cliff Asness">Cliff Asness</a>, a hedge fund manager at AQR Capital.&nbsp; Here is an excerpt of what he has to say:&nbsp; </p>

<p>&#8220;Here&#8217;s a shock. When hedge funds, pension funds, mutual funds, and individuals, including very sweet grandmothers, lend their money they expect to get it back. However, they know, or should know, they take the risk of not being paid back. But if such a bad event happens it usually does not result in a complete loss. A firm in bankruptcy still has assets. It’s not always a pretty process. Bankruptcy court is about figuring out how to most fairly divvy up the remaining assets based on who is owed what and whose contracts come first. The process already has built-in partial protections for employees and pensions, and can set lenders&#8217; contracts aside in order to help the company survive, all of which are the rules of the game lenders know before they lend. But, without this recovery process nobody would lend to risky borrowers. Essentially, lenders accept less than shareholders (means bonds return less than stocks) in good times only because they get more than shareholders in bad times.</p>

<p>
<a href="http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/comments/should_we_be_concerned_about_what_is_going_on_with_chrysler/#extended">Read On »</a>
</p>
 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/gloveiStock_000008069848XSmall_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="300" />The other night as I was watching the news, yes Fox news, I heard an attorney from Case &amp; White talking about how his clients (the Chrysler bondholders) were being asked to take a deal for .33 cents on the dollar and they were being chastised (bullied was the word that was used) by the Administration for holding out.&nbsp; Now bondholders are secured creditors and should get paid more in a bankruptcy than unsecured creditors (including the union).&nbsp; Now the assets of Chrysler are being sold to a new company controlled by Fiat and the union!!&nbsp; I just can&#8217;t believe some of this stuff we are hearing and that is going on in America and give alot of respect to those that can speak out, specifically <a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/05/cliff-asness-i-am-ready-for-my.html" title="Cliff Asness">Cliff Asness</a>, a hedge fund manager at AQR Capital.&nbsp; Here is an excerpt of what he has to say:&nbsp; </p>

<p>&#8220;Here&#8217;s a shock. When hedge funds, pension funds, mutual funds, and individuals, including very sweet grandmothers, lend their money they expect to get it back. However, they know, or should know, they take the risk of not being paid back. But if such a bad event happens it usually does not result in a complete loss. A firm in bankruptcy still has assets. It’s not always a pretty process. Bankruptcy court is about figuring out how to most fairly divvy up the remaining assets based on who is owed what and whose contracts come first. The process already has built-in partial protections for employees and pensions, and can set lenders&#8217; contracts aside in order to help the company survive, all of which are the rules of the game lenders know before they lend. But, without this recovery process nobody would lend to risky borrowers. Essentially, lenders accept less than shareholders (means bonds return less than stocks) in good times only because they get more than shareholders in bad times.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-05-07T17:37:46-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>My Life &amp;amp; Another Drop In The Markets to Come?</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/my_life_another_drop_in_the_markets_to_come/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/my_life_another_drop_in_the_markets_to_come/#When:14:54:37Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/juggling_mom_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="280" /> I know I haven&#8217;t posted in a few days and I am sorry.&nbsp; Life has been very complicated for the past few weeks and I have not found much time to write.&nbsp; The kids were on break last week which always changes how and when I work.&nbsp; And lately, my younger daughter, Carissa is having a hard time with mommy working and when she has a hard time, the whole family is impacted.&nbsp; Also, I am very preoccupied with a potential exciting business partnership and have been spending most of my in due diligence.&nbsp; But I have been keeping up on the news - some of which I would like to share.&nbsp; I am especially concerned about the recovery we are seeing in the stock market and whether it is real or &#8220;fake&#8221; as some think, please <a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/04/guest-post-fake-recovery.html" title="read here">read here</a>.&nbsp; Are we looking at the first bottom on the market with more to come?&nbsp; If we look at PE&#8217;s of the S&amp;P and believe the concensus of $50 of earnings, what is the right PE mulitple - 14 which would give us and S&amp;P around 700.&nbsp; Or is the &#8220;new&#8221; PE multiple more like 6-8, which would put the S&amp;P at 300-400?&nbsp; I like <a href="http://www.bearmarketcentral.com/tomau031809.htm" title="Thomas Au's ">Thomas AU&#8217;s </a>commentary on this and am cautious we might be in for another down leg here.</p>

<p>And for another great insight from William Black on how he thinks this banking crisis will lead to the end of the Obama presidency - because we &#8220;have failed bankers giving advise to failed regulators about failed assets - how can it resukt in anything BUT failure.&#8220;&nbsp; So true&#8230;what was Obama thinking when he hired his financial team?&nbsp; Black goes onto say that &#8220;the Democrats picked the wrong financial team.&#8220; &#8220;Tim Geithner, the current Secretary of the Treasury, and Larry Summers, chairman of the National Economic Council, were important architects of the problems.&nbsp; Geithner especially represents a failed regulator, having presided over the bailouts of major New York banks.&#8220;&nbsp; &#8220;Geithner is flouting the law, in naked violation, in order to pursue the kind of favoritism that the law was designed to prevent. He has introduced the concept of capital insurance, essentially turning the U.S. taxpayer into the sucker who is going to pay for everything. He chose this path because he knew Congress would never authorize a bailout based on crony capitalism.&#8220;&nbsp; He goes further to state that Geithner&#8217;s PIPP plan essentially &#8220;perpetuates zombie banks by mispricing toxic assets that were mispriced to the borrower and mispriced by the lender, and which only served the unfaithful lending agent.&#8220;</p>

<p>Wow, alot to take in&#8230;.not sure where we are heading, but I don&#8217;t think it will be smooth sailing from here.&nbsp; OK back to focus on my new exciting partnership - I cant share yet.&nbsp; But I will.
</p> 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/juggling_mom_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="280" /> I know I haven&#8217;t posted in a few days and I am sorry.&nbsp; Life has been very complicated for the past few weeks and I have not found much time to write.&nbsp; The kids were on break last week which always changes how and when I work.&nbsp; And lately, my younger daughter, Carissa is having a hard time with mommy working and when she has a hard time, the whole family is impacted.&nbsp; Also, I am very preoccupied with a potential exciting business partnership and have been spending most of my in due diligence.&nbsp; But I have been keeping up on the news - some of which I would like to share.&nbsp; I am especially concerned about the recovery we are seeing in the stock market and whether it is real or &#8220;fake&#8221; as some think, please <a href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/04/guest-post-fake-recovery.html" title="read here">read here</a>.&nbsp; Are we looking at the first bottom on the market with more to come?&nbsp; If we look at PE&#8217;s of the S&amp;P and believe the concensus of $50 of earnings, what is the right PE mulitple - 14 which would give us and S&amp;P around 700.&nbsp; Or is the &#8220;new&#8221; PE multiple more like 6-8, which would put the S&amp;P at 300-400?&nbsp; I like <a href="http://www.bearmarketcentral.com/tomau031809.htm" title="Thomas Au's ">Thomas AU&#8217;s </a>commentary on this and am cautious we might be in for another down leg here.</p>

<p>And for another great insight from William Black on how he thinks this banking crisis will lead to the end of the Obama presidency - because we &#8220;have failed bankers giving advise to failed regulators about failed assets - how can it resukt in anything BUT failure.&#8220;&nbsp; So true&#8230;what was Obama thinking when he hired his financial team?&nbsp; Black goes onto say that &#8220;the Democrats picked the wrong financial team.&#8220; &#8220;Tim Geithner, the current Secretary of the Treasury, and Larry Summers, chairman of the National Economic Council, were important architects of the problems.&nbsp; Geithner especially represents a failed regulator, having presided over the bailouts of major New York banks.&#8220;&nbsp; &#8220;Geithner is flouting the law, in naked violation, in order to pursue the kind of favoritism that the law was designed to prevent. He has introduced the concept of capital insurance, essentially turning the U.S. taxpayer into the sucker who is going to pay for everything. He chose this path because he knew Congress would never authorize a bailout based on crony capitalism.&#8220;&nbsp; He goes further to state that Geithner&#8217;s PIPP plan essentially &#8220;perpetuates zombie banks by mispricing toxic assets that were mispriced to the borrower and mispriced by the lender, and which only served the unfaithful lending agent.&#8220;</p>

<p>Wow, alot to take in&#8230;.not sure where we are heading, but I don&#8217;t think it will be smooth sailing from here.&nbsp; OK back to focus on my new exciting partnership - I cant share yet.&nbsp; But I will.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-04-14T14:54:37-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Are You Interested In What The Future of Investing Will Look Like?</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/are_you_interested_in_what_the_future_of_investing_will_look_like/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/are_you_interested_in_what_the_future_of_investing_will_look_like/#When:19:31:28Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/bill_gross2.03__thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="305" /> I just read a great article by Bill Gross on how the future of investing will depend on the future of the global economy.&nbsp; The global economy will be defined by three things:&nbsp; deleveraging, deglobalization and re-regulation.&nbsp; These characteristics will lead to &#8220;slowing global growth, a heightened risk aversion, a distrust of conventional investment model portfolios, and a greater emphasis on surviving as opposed to thriving.&#8220;&nbsp; His view is that the bull markets we had become accustomed to are over and that investing in this climate is &#8220;no longer child&#8217;s play&#8221;.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2009/Investment+Outlook+April+2009+Evolution+or+Revolution+Bill+Gross.htm" title="Read here">Read here</a>.</p> 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/bill_gross2.03__thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="305" /> I just read a great article by Bill Gross on how the future of investing will depend on the future of the global economy.&nbsp; The global economy will be defined by three things:&nbsp; deleveraging, deglobalization and re-regulation.&nbsp; These characteristics will lead to &#8220;slowing global growth, a heightened risk aversion, a distrust of conventional investment model portfolios, and a greater emphasis on surviving as opposed to thriving.&#8220;&nbsp; His view is that the bull markets we had become accustomed to are over and that investing in this climate is &#8220;no longer child&#8217;s play&#8221;.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2009/Investment+Outlook+April+2009+Evolution+or+Revolution+Bill+Gross.htm" title="Read here">Read here</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-03-31T19:31:28-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The New Toxic Asset Plan</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/the_new_toxic_asset_plan/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/the_new_toxic_asset_plan/#When:17:41:15Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/question-mark_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="374" /> Yesterday, we finally got some clarity on the Treasury’s toxic asset plan and the market appeared to like it – but the devil is in the details.&nbsp; I am going to attempt to simplify it – for my readers as well as for myself!!</p>

<p>So, let’s start with an overview of what has been clogging the credit markets:&nbsp; the biggest problem has been the legacy (toxic) assets which are complicated parts of home mortgages - many of which have gone bad, and many more of which are likely to go bad in the near future. For simplicty, suppose a bank has $100 million (face value) of these assets on its books.&nbsp; But due to the increased bad debts associated with these assets and mark to market accounting, the banks have had to mark the assets down to $80 million, and in the process have had to take huge losses (in this case $20 million). Most of the banks would like to get these assets off its books, but claim there is no market for them or in other words that there is a <b>liquidity issue</b>.</p>

<p>In reality it might not be a liquidity issue since there are people out there who might be willing to buy those assets for say $10 million. That, however, would require the bank to write-off an additional $70 million and if it did so, it would be bankrupt. However, let’s just say this bank is in the class that has been deemed “too big to fail.”&nbsp; So in comes the NEW PLAN.</p>

<p>
<a href="http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/comments/the_new_toxic_asset_plan/#extended">Read On »</a>
</p>
 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/question-mark_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="374" /> Yesterday, we finally got some clarity on the Treasury’s toxic asset plan and the market appeared to like it – but the devil is in the details.&nbsp; I am going to attempt to simplify it – for my readers as well as for myself!!</p>

<p>So, let’s start with an overview of what has been clogging the credit markets:&nbsp; the biggest problem has been the legacy (toxic) assets which are complicated parts of home mortgages - many of which have gone bad, and many more of which are likely to go bad in the near future. For simplicty, suppose a bank has $100 million (face value) of these assets on its books.&nbsp; But due to the increased bad debts associated with these assets and mark to market accounting, the banks have had to mark the assets down to $80 million, and in the process have had to take huge losses (in this case $20 million). Most of the banks would like to get these assets off its books, but claim there is no market for them or in other words that there is a <b>liquidity issue</b>.</p>

<p>In reality it might not be a liquidity issue since there are people out there who might be willing to buy those assets for say $10 million. That, however, would require the bank to write-off an additional $70 million and if it did so, it would be bankrupt. However, let’s just say this bank is in the class that has been deemed “too big to fail.”&nbsp; So in comes the NEW PLAN.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-03-24T17:41:15-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Ladies:&amp;nbsp; Do You Have What It Takes To Be a Leader?</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/ladies_do_you_have_what_it_takes_to_be_a_leader/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/ladies_do_you_have_what_it_takes_to_be_a_leader/#When:16:34:02Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/Women-LeadersLarge_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="276" /> Last week, I sat in a crowded room listening to Joanna Barsh, Director at McKinsey &amp; Co talk about <b>“Centered Leadership: How Talented Women Thrive”.&nbsp;  </b>While listening to this very accomplished women, I wondered if this economic crisis would have been any different had there been more women at the table (see <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/72d4154c-11ca-11de-87b1-0000779fd2ac.html" title="FT article ">FT article </a>which refutes this theory).&nbsp; I don’t know the answer and I don’t want to turn this into a gender debate but I do wonder why so many women start off after college with just as much drive, intelligence and education as men but only a few ends up reaching the top echelons - in business, education and government.&nbsp; We never seem to have a majority of women at the top.&nbsp; Yes, I know there are a few women at the top levels – but <b>are there enough </b>of them to <b>make a difference</b>?&nbsp; How can we, as mothers and mentors, help more women succeed?&nbsp; How can we help our daughters succeed? What are the characteristics of successful women leaders?&nbsp; Can women <b>LEARN</b> how to be more successful?&nbsp; Joanna Barsh thinks so and spoke to us about the findings of a McKinsey initiative, called the <b>McKinsey Leadership Project.</b>&nbsp; The initiative was driven in part to learn what “drives and sustains successful women leaders” and to impart this knowledge to young women to help them navigate the sometimes difficult path to leadership.&nbsp; So what did Mc Kinsey find out in this study?</p>

<p>First, McKinsey found that there were several <b>pre-conditions </b>to successful leadership:&nbsp; <b>intelligence, desire to lead, communication skills and tolerance for change</b>.&nbsp; If a person already possessed these skills, McKinsey found that successful women leaders also had five “broad and interrelated” dimensions:&nbsp; <b>meaning, framing, connecting, engaging and maintaining energy </b>– all of which can be <b>learned</b>.</p>

<p>
<a href="http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/comments/ladies_do_you_have_what_it_takes_to_be_a_leader/#extended">Read On »</a>
</p>
 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject>Women&#39;s Leadership</dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://chicks.ehclients.com/images/uploads/Women-LeadersLarge_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="250" height="276" /> Last week, I sat in a crowded room listening to Joanna Barsh, Director at McKinsey &amp; Co talk about <b>“Centered Leadership: How Talented Women Thrive”.&nbsp;  </b>While listening to this very accomplished women, I wondered if this economic crisis would have been any different had there been more women at the table (see <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/72d4154c-11ca-11de-87b1-0000779fd2ac.html" title="FT article ">FT article </a>which refutes this theory).&nbsp; I don’t know the answer and I don’t want to turn this into a gender debate but I do wonder why so many women start off after college with just as much drive, intelligence and education as men but only a few ends up reaching the top echelons - in business, education and government.&nbsp; We never seem to have a majority of women at the top.&nbsp; Yes, I know there are a few women at the top levels – but <b>are there enough </b>of them to <b>make a difference</b>?&nbsp; How can we, as mothers and mentors, help more women succeed?&nbsp; How can we help our daughters succeed? What are the characteristics of successful women leaders?&nbsp; Can women <b>LEARN</b> how to be more successful?&nbsp; Joanna Barsh thinks so and spoke to us about the findings of a McKinsey initiative, called the <b>McKinsey Leadership Project.</b>&nbsp; The initiative was driven in part to learn what “drives and sustains successful women leaders” and to impart this knowledge to young women to help them navigate the sometimes difficult path to leadership.&nbsp; So what did Mc Kinsey find out in this study?</p>

<p>First, McKinsey found that there were several <b>pre-conditions </b>to successful leadership:&nbsp; <b>intelligence, desire to lead, communication skills and tolerance for change</b>.&nbsp; If a person already possessed these skills, McKinsey found that successful women leaders also had five “broad and interrelated” dimensions:&nbsp; <b>meaning, framing, connecting, engaging and maintaining energy </b>– all of which can be <b>learned</b>.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-03-17T16:34:02-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Ultimate Blog Party</title>
      <link>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/ultimate_blog_party/</link>
      <guid>http://chicksandbalances.com/index.php/blog/ultimate_blog_party/#When:15:10:37Z</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.5minutesformom.com/5654/ultimate-blog-party-2009-instructions"><img src="http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k210/5m4m/buttons/events/ubg1.gif" title="Ultimate Blog Party 2009" alt="Ultimate Blog Party 2009" /></a></p>

<p>I am going to the LIVE blog party in NYC next week on March 25 - please let me know if you might want to come.</p> 
]]></description> 
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.5minutesformom.com/5654/ultimate-blog-party-2009-instructions"><img src="http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k210/5m4m/buttons/events/ubg1.gif" title="Ultimate Blog Party 2009" alt="Ultimate Blog Party 2009" /></a></p>

<p>I am going to the LIVE blog party in NYC next week on March 25 - please let me know if you might want to come.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2009-03-17T15:10:37-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
